Absolute Ceiling:
Asymmetric Thrust: Uneven thrust created by the ascending and descending propeller blades. This condition also occurs when the thrust produced by the engines of a multi-engine airplane is uneven.
Critical Engine: The engine with the most adverse effect on controllability and climb performance of a multi-engine airplane if it fails.
Drift Down: The unavoidable descent due to the loss of an engine when above the single-engine absolute ceiling of an airplane.
Propeller Synchronization: Adjusting the propeller controls to operate the propellers in unison, eliminating the uncomfortable noise of two propellers operating at slightly different rates.
Service Ceiling:
Windmilling: The rotation of an aircraft propeller created by air flowing around it when the engine is not operating.
Zero-Sideslip: A control technique used in following an engine failure in a multi-engine aircraft where the pilot maintains an attitude that minimizes drag, alleviating the sideslip of the airplane.
VMC:
VMC is marked on the airspeed indicator with a red line, as determined under specific circumstances.
VYSE: The best rate-of-climb (or minimum rate-of-sink) speed with OEI. VYSE is marked on the airspeed indicator with a blue line, as determined at maximum weight and sea-level altitude.
VYSE is a performance speed. VMC addresses directional control.
VXSE: The best angle-of-climb speed with OEI.
VSSE: The intentional one-engine inoperative (OEI) airspeed. It is considered the minimum airspeed for intentionally rendering an engine inoperative in flight for pilot training. No intentional engine failure in flight should be performed below this airspeed.
14 CFR Part 23 requires airplane manufacturers to determine VMC, if applicable, for the most critical configurations used in takeoff and landing operations. The following configurations are generally the most critical.
Baseline Measurement: An airplane must meet performance requirements for certification in still air and standard atmospheric conditions at sea level. This is necessary to establish a standard of measurement.
Density Altitude: Increasing density altitude reduces engine performance and propeller efficiency. Therefore, VMC decreases as altitude or temperature increases with normally aspirated engines. For turbocharged engines, VMC remains constant up to the critical altitude.
Bank Angle: Increased weight increases the horizontal component of lift in a given bank angle, helping to offset the yawing moment caused by asymmetric thrust. As a result, less rudder pressure is needed to maintain control, and VMC decreases.
Inertia: A heavily loaded airplane has more inertia than a lightly loaded one, giving it greater resistance to yawing, which also reduces VMC.
Rudder Authority: As the CG moves aft, the moment arm of the rudder is shortened. This reduces the rudder’s leverage, giving it less authority to counteract yawing forces. Therefore, VMC increases as the CG is moved aft.
VMC increases as drag on the inoperative engine increases.
Windmilling: A windmilling propeller (low pitch–high RPM) creates more drag than a stationary or feathered propeller, resulting in the highest VMC.
Unfeathered: When the propeller is stationary, an unfeathered position creates more drag than a feathered propeller.
Feathered: When the propeller is feathered, the blades align with the relative wind, minimizing drag. This reduction in drag lowers VMC compared to an unfeathered or windmilling propeller.
Wing Flaps: For most light twins, the takeoff flap setting is 0° of flaps. Extending the flaps increases drag behind the operative engine. This can have a stabilizing effect that may reduce VMC.
Landing Gear: Extending the landing gear can create a keel effect that aids directional stability and decreases VMC. VMC increases when the landing gear is retracted.
Trim: Since the airplane is usually trimmed to a neutral position on takeoff, having the aircraft pre-trimmed as an aid to an engine failure would be “cheating.”
Banking Toward the Operative Engine: In a bank, the horizontal component of lift helps the rudder counteract the operative engine’s thrust. When banking toward the operating engine, VMC decreases by approximately 3 knots for every degree of bank less than 5°.
Banking Away from the Operative Engine: Banking away from the operating engine increases VMC.
Power Imbalance: A higher power imbalance between the operating and inoperative engines results in more asymmetrical thrust, increasing VMC.
Power Effects: Any condition that increases power on the operating engine raises VMC, while factors like power reduction, higher altitude, increased temperature, or lower air density decrease VMC.
Dynamic: In dynamic VMC certification, test pilots cut the critical engine at gradually reduced speeds to find the minimum speed where directional control can be maintained within 20° of the original heading. This involves high power settings and quick pitch adjustments, making it too risky for typical flight training.
Static: Static VMC certification involves maintaining straight flight with up to 5° of bank toward the operating engine. This method is safer and more closely reflects VMC demonstrations in flight training.
When a multi-engine aircraft experiences an engine failure and the engines are not mounted on the longitudinal axis, there are unbalanced forces and turning moments about the CG.
Pitch Down: The loss of induced airflow over the horizontal stabilizer results in less negative lift produced by the tail. Additional back pressure is required to maintain level flight.
Roll Toward the Inoperative Engine: The loss of the accelerated slipstream air over the wing of the inoperative engine results in a reduction of lift on that wing. Therefore, due to asymmetrical lift, the aircraft tends to roll toward the inoperative engine. This requires additional aileron pressure into the operative engine.
Yaw: Asymmetrical thrust requires rudder pressure toward the operating engine.
The loss of one engine results in a 50% loss of power but an approximate 80% loss of climb performance. This can be verified by comparing the climb performance charts for one and two engines operating under the same atmospheric conditions.
Following an engine failure in flight, the airplane yaws toward the inoperative engine due to asymmetrical thrust. The rudder must be used to maintain directional control. With the rudder deflected, the airplane’s nose is misaligned with the relative wind, resulting in a sideslip. The sideslip increases drag and reduces performance.
Optimal performance is achieved in a zero-sideslip condition, which results in the fuselage being aligned with the relative wind.
The use of a yaw string can demonstrate zero-sideslip. A yaw string is a piece of string or yarn approximately 18″–36″ long, taped to the windshield or the nose near the windshield. In a zero-sideslip condition, the relative wind will cause the string to align with the airplane’s longitudinal axis. The string will position itself straight up the center of the windshield.
Each engine’s descending propeller blade will produce greater thrust than the ascending blade when the airplane is operated under power and at positive angles of attack.
Even though both propellers produce the same thrust, the descending blade on the right engine has a longer moment arm (greater leverage) than the left engine’s descending blade. As a result, the left engine’s failure will result in the most asymmetrical thrust.
Asymmetrical thrust (P-Factor) results in a longer moment arm to the center of thrust of the right engine than the left engine. Therefore, the center of lift is farther out on the right wing, resulting in a greater rolling tendency with a loss of the left engine. The left engine’s failure also results in a more significant downward pitching moment due to the greater loss of negative lift produced by the tail.
A spinning propeller produces a spiraling wind pattern that rotates in the same direction as the propeller’s rotation. The spiraling slipstream of air from the left engine strikes the vertical stabilizer from the left. This helps counteract the yaw caused by a failure of the right engine.
The right engine’s slipstream does not reach the vertical stabilizer. If the left engine fails, the right engine’s slipstream will not counteract the yaw toward the inoperative engine.
For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction. A propeller that rotates clockwise (right) will tend to roll the aircraft counter-clockwise (left). The airplane will tend to roll toward the inoperative engine regardless of which engine has failed.
On a multi-engine airplane with clockwise rotating propellers, the effect of torque during OEI flight will:
Condition | VMC | Performance |
Below Maximum Weight | Increases | Increases |
Maximum Weight | Decreases | Decreases |
Landing Gear Up | Increases | Increases |
Landing Gear Down | Decreases | Decreases |
Wing Flaps Retracted | Increases | Increases |
Wing Flaps Extended | Decreases | Decreases |
Forward CG | Decreases | Decreases |
Condition | VMC | Performance |
Aft CG | Increases | Increases |
Cowl Flaps Open | Decreases | Decreases |
Cowl Flaps Closed | Increases | Increases |
Windmilling Propeller | Increases | Decreases |
Feathered Propeller | Decreases | Increases |
Above Standard Temperature | Decreases | Decreases |
Below Standard Temperature | Increases | Increases |
Condition | VMC | Performance |
1° to 5° Bank | Decreases | Increases |
No Bank | Increases | Decreases |
> 5° Bank | Decreases | Decreases |
Out of Ground Effect | Increases | Decreases |
In Ground Effect | Decreases | Increases |
With normally aspirated engines, an increase in altitude or temperature results in reduced engine performance and propeller efficiency. This results in a lower minimum control speed (VMC) as altitude is increased. However, the calibrated stall speed (VS) does not decrease with altitude.
There exists an altitude where each of the following exists:
The density altitude where VMC and VS are equal is called the critical density altitude. Here, the airplane will “stall and yaw” simultaneously under a condition of asymmetrical thrust. The airplane could experience an abrupt change in attitude or enter into a spin.
The manufacturer must determine climb performance at various weights and altitudes for most multi-engine training airplanes. The airplane does not need to demonstrate climb performance. The published single-engine rate-of-climb may be a negative number.
After a critical loss of thrust, low-speed, multi-engine airplanes with less than 6 passenger seats that do not meet single-engine crash-worthiness requirements must demonstrate a climb gradient of 1.5% at a pressure altitude of 5,000′ in the cruise configuration and out of ground effect.
Multi-engine aircraft weighing less than 6,000 pounds and with a VS0 airspeed under 61 knots have no minimum performance criteria.
Multi-engine aircraft weighing more than 6,000 pounds or aircraft with a VS0 above 61 knots must demonstrate a positive engine-out rate of climb at 5,000′ with OEI and feathered and the aircraft in a clean configuration. The single-engine rate of climb must be equal to 0.027 VS02. For multi-engine airplanes certified after February 1991, the single-engine rate of climb is expressed as a climb gradient, which is 1.5%.
In addition to the planning required for a single-engine airplane, the pilot of a multi-engine airplane should become aware of:
Before taking the runway, the pilot should know if the airplane can climb following an engine failure. A safety margin should be taken into consideration. Turbulence, wind gusts, or poor technique can easily negate even a 200 FPM rate of climb.
Taxiing a multi-engine airplane generally involves the same procedures as taxiing a single-engine airplane but has some additional considerations:
Multi-engine takeoff procedures are similar to single-engine airplanes, but pilots should be aware of the following considerations.
Normal Takeoff: The manufacturer’s recommended rotation speed (VR) or liftoff speed (VLOF) should be used during normal operations. If the manufacturer did not publish takeoff speeds, pilots should use a minimum of VMC plus five knots for VR.
Crosswind Takeoff: With a crosswind, the pilot can prevent side drift by rotating more positively or at a higher speed. However, the pilot should remember that the AFM/POH performance figures were calculated at the recommended VR or VLOF.
Short-Field Takeoff: Just after rotation and liftoff, the airplane should be allowed to accelerate to VX and make the initial climb over obstacles at VX. The transition to VY should be made as obstacles are cleared.
Soft-Field Takeoff: Soft-field procedures would allow the airplane to become airborne before reaching VMC. These procedures are not tested during pilot certification and should not be practiced.
Climb Attitude: After leaving the ground, altitude gain is more important than achieving an excess of airspeed. Excessive speed cannot be efficiently traded for altitude in the event of an engine failure. However, excessively high climb attitudes can limit forward visibility and reduce climb performance.
Gear Retraction: The gear should be retracted after a positive rate of climb is established. It is prudent to leave the gear down until the airplane is past the point where a safe landing could be made on the remaining runway or overrun. A general recommendation is to raise the landing gear no later than VYSE, and once the gear is up, consider it a “Go” commitment if climb performance is available.
Flap Retraction: If flaps were extended for takeoff, they should be retracted as recommended in the AFM/POH.
Initial Climb Speed: The airplane should be accelerated to and maintain VY until a safe maneuvering altitude, at least 400′ AGL, is obtained. Any speed above or below VY reduces the performance of the airplane.
En Route Climb Speed: Once a safe single-engine maneuvering altitude has been reached, the transition to an en route climb speed should be made. This speed is higher than VY and is usually maintained to provide better visibility, increased engine cooling, and a higher groundspeed.
Power Reduction: Power can be reduced as the transition to en route climb speed is made or as recommended in the AFM/POH.
Multi-engine approach and landing procedures are similar to those of single-engine airplanes, but pilots should be aware of the following considerations.
Traffic Pattern and Approach: The traffic pattern and approach are typically flown at higher indicated airspeeds in a multi-engine airplane. The approach should be made with power. A stabilized approach is essential.
Normal Landing: If a recommended approach speed is not furnished, the speed should be no slower than VYSE until on a short final with the landing assured, but in no case less than VMC. A small amount of power may be carried through the roundout and touchdown to prevent high sink rates. With the high wing loading and drag from two windmilling propellers, there is minimal float. Full stall landings are generally undesirable in twins.
Crosswind Correction: The crab and sideslip (wing-low) methods are typically used in conjunction. On final, a crab angle is used to track the extended runway centerline. Before touchdown, the pilot transitions to a sideslip.
Short-Field Approach Speed: Some AFM/POHs recommend a slightly slower-than-normal approach airspeed. If no speed is published, pilots should use the normal approach speed.
Determining which engine has failed should be primarily accomplished by observing the control inputs required to maintain straight flight. Outside visual references or the inclinometer (ball) should be used to maintain directional control.
"Dead foot, dead engine."
If the airplane is equipped with an exhaust gas temperature (EGT) gauge, it can be used to confirm an engine failure.
Gauges that should not be used to confirm an engine failure include:
The pilot should reject the takeoff if an engine fails before reaching VR or VLOF in a small GA airplane. The abort procedure is generally the same as in a single-engine airplane but with an additional need for maintaining directional control due to asymmetrical thrust.
In the event of an engine failure shortly after takeoff, a decision must be made to continue flight or land, even off-airport. This is called the area of decision. The position of the landing gear is a critical factor in making the decision.
If single-engine climb performance is adequate and the airplane is configured correctly, the climb may be continued. If a climb is impossible, a landing must be made in the most suitable area. Attempting to climb must be discontinued when it is not within the airplane’s capability.
The landing gear position is critical in deciding whether to abort or continue the takeoff. As a general rule, if the landing gear lever has not been moved into the up position, the pilot should abort the takeoff roll and use the remaining runway and overrun area to slow the airplane in the event of an engine failure.
If the airplane experiences an engine failure after liftoff and single-engine climb performance has been determined to be inadequate, a landing must be accomplished on whatever lies ahead. The greatest risk would be to attempt to force the airplane to climb when it is not within its performance capability. Higher engine-out landing success rates have been encountered when the airplane is landed under positive control.
A pilot attempting a climb with OEI will experience a high workload while addressing the critical factors of directional control, climb, and configuration that determine the successful outcome of the maneuver.
The rudder and aileron should be used, aggressively if necessary, to counteract the yaw and rolling tendencies. At least a 5° of bank should initially be established into the operating engine to help maintain directional control. The amount of lift lost by banking up to 5° is negligible, but exceeding 5° of bank rapidly decreases climb performance. Reducing thrust on the operative engine is necessary if the yaw cannot be controlled.
Once directional control is established and the airplane configured for climb, the bank angle should be reduced to obtain the best climb performance (zero-sideslip condition).
Memory items from the AFM/POH should be accomplished to establish the airplane in the optimum climb configuration. The printed copy should be reviewed as time permits.
Most procedures direct the pilot to assume VYSE, set takeoff power, retract the flaps and landing gear, and identify, verify, and feather the failed engine.
Challenge | Response |
Airspeed | Maintain VYSE |
Directional Control | Maintain Heading |
Mixtures | Full Forward |
Propellers | Full Forward |
Throttles | Full Forward |
Gear and Flaps | Retract |
Identify | Dead Engine |
Verify | By Closing Throttle |
Propeller | Feather |
An emergency should be declared with ATC once workload permits. The pilot should make ATC aware of the severity of the problem and his or her intentions.
An engine failure during cruise flight generally offers more time to diagnose and resolve engine problems. Generally, the initial procedures for an engine failure after takeoff can also be used for an engine failure in flight. However, the engine securing procedure, including propeller feathering, may be delayed until it is apparent that the engine will not restart.
In general, a restart attempt can be made if:
If the airplane is above its single-engine absolute ceiling during an engine failure, it will slowly lose altitude. The descent rate is greatest immediately following the failure and decreases as the single-engine ceiling is approached.
To minimize the rate of altitude loss, the pilot should:
A precautionary shutdown is an engine failure with a twist. The engine is failing but not failed.
In this scenario, the PIC must determine the best course of action. To make the determination, the pilot should check the engine gauges and visually inspect the engine, if possible, for signs of fire or damage.
Considerations:
The pilot should divert to the nearest suitable airport and declare an emergency with ATC for priority handling.
An approach and landing with OEI are essentially the same as a two-engine approach and landing. Flight in the traffic pattern with OEI should be similar to a normal traffic pattern but with the following recommendations incorporated.
For most light twins, a single-engine go-around must be avoided because:
As a practical rule for single-engine approaches, once the airplane is on final approach with landing gear and flaps extended, it is committed to land.
While simulating engine failures, the instructor’s foot should be positioned to prevent the opposite rudder from moving backward. If the instructor fails the left engine, his or her foot should block the right rudder from moving backward. The opposite is true for a simulated failure of the right engines. This prevents the learner from applying rudder pressure toward the inoperative engine but does not hinder the ability to apply pressure in the appropriate direction.
The following is an easy way to remember which rudder (left or right) should be blocked as a power lever is reduced (pulled).
Pull right, block left. Pull left, block right.
Altitude permitting, the instructor should give one verbal warning if the learner inputs the incorrect rudder control. If the learner does not respond to the verbal warning, the instructor should take the flight controls and return to normal operation.
The instructor must guard the throttle quadrant in critical phases of flight and while conducting OEI training. It is common for a learner to rush through a checklist and attempt to feather the propeller or cut off the wrong mixture.
Engine failures are evaluated on practical tests in four phases of flight:
Instructors simulating an engine failure on takeoff must do so before the airplane obtains 50% of the VMC airspeed. Since airspeeds this low are generally not indicated on the airspeed indicator, this failure should be simulated as soon as practicable once the takeoff roll begins.
Applying rudder pressure or dragging a brake are practical ways of simulating an engine failure or partial power loss. The correct action is to abort the takeoff by retarding both throttles to idle, applying the wheel brakes, and maintaining directional control. Any variation from these actions could result in a rapid departure from the runway. The instructor should recover immediately.
Another method of simulating an engine failure is to pull a mixture lever to CUTOFF. The instructor should increase the mixture to restore power as the learner responds correctly by moving the throttles to idle. If the learner does not respond promptly and correctly, the instructor should also cutoff the other mixture. It is better to be on the runway with two inoperative engines than in the grass.
The minimum altitude for simulating an engine failure after liftoff is 400′ AGL. The failure should be simulated by reducing power with the throttle. Extreme caution must be exercised to prevent the learner from applying pressure to the wrong rudder pedal or reducing power on the operating engine.
The learner should immediately perform the proper checklist from memory while controlling the aircraft. The instructor can establish a zero-thrust setting after the failed engine has been identified, verified, and feathered (simulated).
Feathering can be simulated by moving the propeller lever slightly toward the feather position (or as appropriate if equipped with an auto-feather feature). The instructor’s hand should guard the throttle quadrant to prevent a full feather or an inadvertent mixture cutoff.
Deviations from the proper engine failure procedure must be quickly corrected to avoid a loss of control. If safety is ever in doubt, the instructor should take the flight controls and recover to a safe altitude. Later, any deficiencies in the learner’s performance can be corrected.
Above 3,000′ AGL (or higher altitude if specified by the aircraft manufacturer), engines can be failed by either the mixture or the throttle, though the mixture is preferred. The instructor should use caution when failing engines to avoid rapid throttle movements.
Feathering for pilot flight training and testing purposes should be performed only at a safe altitude and when the aircraft is in a position where a safe landing at an established airport can be readily accomplished in the event difficulty is encountered during the engine restart process. The instructor should locate the nearest suitable airport before simulating an engine failure.
At a safe altitude, the engine with the simulated failure can be secured, which means stopping the propeller’s rotation through feathering. Securing begins when the propeller lever is moved to idle. If the aircraft drifts down to an unsafe altitude, the instructor should take over the controls to restore power.
After securing the engine, the learner should be taught to reduce power on the operating engine (if conditions permit), declare an emergency, and find a suitable place to land. This trains the learner to think through the emergency scenario and separates the engine securing from the engine restart checklist.
If the engine does not restart, the instructor must evaluate when to discontinue the restart attempt, feather the inoperative engine’s propeller, and land. This should be considered an emergency.
An approach and landing with OEI is essentially the same as a two-engine approach and landing, but a higher-than-normal power setting is necessary on the operative engine.
To maintain stability and control, the rudder should be increased/decreased with the corresponding increase/decrease of the throttle. A rapid power increase at low airspeeds and in proximity to the ground can be very hazardous if not accompanied by a corresponding rudder input.
Single-engine go-arounds should not be practiced. During training, the instructor should brief that below 400′ AGL, the learner has both throttles available for a go-around. Both throttles should be increased together to eliminate and avoid asymmetrical thrust situations.
Full stalls in a multi-engine airplane should only be practiced with a qualified flight instructor present. Clear learning objectives and precautions should be discussed.
Single-engine stalls, or stalls with significantly more power on one engine than the other, should not be attempted due to the likelihood of a departure from controlled flight and possible spin entry. Similarly, simulated engine failures should not be performed during stall entry and recovery.
Immediate application of full power in a stalled condition has an associated risk due to the possibility of asymmetric thrust. Maximum power should be delayed until reaching a speed above VMC.